homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Why 7.5 billion people on Earth is bad news

We are legion!

Alexandru Micu
May 16, 2017 @ 7:05 pm

share Share

Humanity has officially passed the 7.5 billion mark, the World Population Clock reports.

Woop woop, party time!

Lego People.

Yay, party!

Nah I’m just kidding. It’s actually a pretty bad milestone we’ve reached here. More people means less access and security for vital resources like food, water, and energy, not to mention non-vital ones that play a huge part in the quality of our lives. A global population of 7.5 billion means more required food, more greenhouse gas emissions, and the increase in demand means more meddling in already stressed ecosystems.

Population Matters also notes that the growth isn’t uniform across the globe. So it could lead to more clearing of wild areas for homes and industries in the areas with greater growth, and plunge some countries deeper into poverty. It’s not only environmental concerns that grow alongside the population figures: greater competition for resources, especially land, food, and water, will push “prices up not just for consumers but for the businesses and industries which need them too.” The social woes caused by this greater competition (and very likely by shortages) will cause population and migration pressures which will feed into growing political instability.

“Huge potential markets like much of sub-Saharan Africa will be stuck in poverty and we’ll see political instability arising from population and migration pressures, including conflict over resources,” Head of Campaigns Alistair Currie told edie.net.

And while some companies might be tempted to treat a larger population as just a larger customer base, too much growth won’t be good either for us or the planet — especially considering that we’re living longer and longer.

“Growth cannot continue indefinitely on a finite planet and fewer consumers is ultimately better for all of us. Business must start recognizing and adapting to that reality. With action now, we can limit population growth and eventually reach sustainable levels,” Currie added.

China boasts the largest population of any single country, with 1.38 billion people living inside its borders. India comes second with 1.34 billion, and the US takes third place with 326 million.

As we’ve written before, we’re currently using one-and-a-half-Earths‘ worth of resource output per year — a figure that will skyrocket dramatically with population growth. Population Matters estimates we’ll be using three Earths by 2050 if consumption and growth patterns don’t change.

share Share

Tennis May Add Nearly 10 Years to Your Life and Most People Are Ignoring It

Could a weekly match on the court be the secret to a longer, healthier life?

Humans Have Been Reshaping Earth with Fire for at Least 50,000 Years

Fossil charcoal reveals early humans’ growing impact on the carbon cycle before the Ice Age.

The Strangest Microbe Ever Found Straddles The Line Between Life and Non-Life

A newly discovered archaeon blurs the boundary between cells and viruses.

This $8750 Watch Was Designed for Space and Could Finally Replace Apollo-era Omega Watches

An audacious new timepiece dares to outshine Omega’s legacy in space

The Brain May Make New Neurons in Adulthood and Even Old Age

Researchers identify the birthplace of new brain cells well into late adulthood.

Your gut has a secret weapon against 'forever chemicals': microbes

Our bodies have some surprising allies sometimes.

High IQ People Are Strikingly Better at Forecasting the Future

New study shows intelligence shapes our ability to forecast life events accurately.

Cheese Before Bed Might Actually Be Giving You Nightmares

Eating dairy or sweets late at night may fuel disturbing dreams, new study finds.

Your Personal Air Defense System Is Here and It’s Built to Vaporize Up to 30 Mosquitoes per Second with Lasers

LiDAR-guided Photon Matrix claims to fell 30 mosquitoes a second, but questions remain.

Scientists Ranked the Most Hydrating Drinks and Water Didn't Win

Milk is more hydrating than water. Here's why.