homehome Home chatchat Notifications


It doesn't actually take 21 days to build a habit. Here's what the science says

It may take months and sometimes years to form a habit. However, if you're exceptionally good at something, you might develop it into a habit in just four days.

Rupendra Brahambhatt
January 31, 2025 @ 2:04 pm

share Share

Many self-help books claim that if you want to develop a good habit, you should at least practice it for 21 days. Some studies also support this 21-day phenomenon using data. However, a team of researchers from the University of South Australia doesn’t agree. 

They performed one of the most detailed studies on the matter and concluded that it takes longer to build a habit: around two months.

A man practicing push-ups at home using a table. Image credits: Mikhail Nilov/Pexels

The researchers combed through 20 studies involving 2,601 participants trying to develop various habits related to improving their health, diet, personality, and behavior. This meta-analysis (a study of studies) revealed some surprising results.

“Brief 21-day challenges or kickstarts are unlikely to be sufficient to firmly ingrain new habits. Individuals should anticipate a timeframe of at least two to five months to develop automaticity in new health habits, rather than the commonly cited 21-day period,” the study authors said.

Automaticity demands time and patience

In their study, the researchers explain that habit formation occurs in four stages:

  1. The first stage is when a person decides to take action, which means that he or she has thought of making a change.
  2. The second stage is when the person begins taking action i.e. translating thoughts into action.
  3. The third stage is when the individual repeats the behavior or action.
  4. After some time finally comes to the fourth stage called automaticity. This is when the habit is ingrained in their routine and becomes a part of their lifestyle. At this stage, a person doesn’t have to think about practicing the habit, they do it without any external or internal motivation. 

Essentially, only after the fourth stage is completed the habit is truly formed.

“While the first three stages are common to behavior change in general, the development of automaticity is unique to habit formation, occurring through consistent repetition of behavior in a stable context over time. Automaticity is where a behavior displays some or all the following features: lack of awareness, efficiency, uncontrollability, and unintentionality,” the study authors explain,” the study authors explained.

The meta-analysis suggests that habits form somewhere between 59 to 66 days for the quickest learners and 106 to 154 days for the slowest — meaning that on average it takes two to five months for a person to reach habit automaticity. 

However, the average number does not apply to all and can vary from person to person. For example, the analysis also reports cases where a habit formed in just four days, while in other cases, it took up to 335 days for a person to master a habit. Some people are naturally more inclined towards certain things while most others have to develop the skills.

“Having a realistic expectation that habit formation takes time can help individuals stay motivated and persist through the initial stages of behavioral change,” the study authors added. 

This isn’t the final verdict on habit formation

The meta-analysis provides reasonable insights into the science of habit formation, offering a more relevant perspective compared to the widely popular 21-day theory. However, it also has some limitations. 

For instance, the analysis includes only 20 studies with a small sample size, the majority of which focus on developing habits related to diet. This makes it susceptible to various biases, a point with which the study authors also agree. They clearly mention that most of the studies included in their meta-analysis had a high risk of bias rating.

“To better understand the duration of habit formation, future research should prioritize high-quality experimental designs, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with larger sample sizes to reduce bias and improve reliability,” Ben Singh, first author of the study, and a research fellow at the University of South Australia told Gizmodo.

The meta-analysis is published in the journal Healthcare.

share Share

5 Everyday Products That Contain Hidden Lead—Are You at Risk?

Lead has made its way to not just your food but also to your lipstick and protein powder. Here's what we know.

Oldest Evidence of Human-Caused Lead Pollution Dates from Over 5,000 Years Ago, Around the Aegean Sea

Lead pollution started peaking when the Romans took over the Aegean coastline.

How To Solve Any Problem Using Enrico Fermi's Back-Of-The-Envelope Math (And Some Common Sense)

Estimate anything in the world with a napkin and a pen.

Human thought has a speed limit — and it's surprisingly slow

For now, humans remain slow thinkers. We dream faster than we speak. We see more than we can process and we imagine more than we can act upon.

Microplastics can cause brain clots in mice. Could they do the same in humans?

We've only recently discovered microplastics are a thing and we still don't know exactly how bad they are for our health. This study doesn't bode well.

Doomsday Clock Moves to 89 Seconds: The Closest Humanity Has Ever Been to Armageddon

Escalating risks from nuclear tensions, climate threats, and emerging technologies drive a dire update.

Abortion drug Mifepristone is safer than Viagra or Penicillin. So why do Republicans want to ban it?

The fight over mifepristone isn't about safety—it's about control. RFK Jr. and conservative groups continue pushing misinformation to restrict access.

Tracking 32,000 Bees with QR Codes. Turns Out, Bee Foraging Is Weirder Than You Think

Scientists unfold the secret lives of bees using QR codes. Here's all the secrets they found.

Scientists Create Mice with Two Fathers in a Genetic Breakthrough That Could Save Endangered Species

Researchers use CRISPR to overcome seemingly insurmontable reproductive barriers — but that doesn't mean this could work for humans.

Ancient Water, Alien Salts, and Life’s Building Blocks Were All Found in Bennu Asteroid

A bright fireball streaked across the sky above mountains, glaciers and spruce forest near the town of Revelstoke in British Columbia, Canada, on the evening of March 31, 1965. Fragments of this meteorite, discovered by beaver trappers, fell over a lake. A layer of ice saved them from the depths and allowed scientists a peek […]