homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Scientists find 2.5-billion-year-old fossils of bacteria -- there was no oxygen in the atmosphere then

Who needs oxygen when you got ... sulfur?

Tibi Puiu
November 30, 2016 @ 9:55 pm

share Share

Fossil of 2.5 billion-year-old sulfur-oxidizing bacterium. Photo/Andrew Czaja

Fossil of 2.5 billion-year-old sulfur-oxidizing bacterium. Photo/Andrew Czaja

Our planet today is paradise, a real Garden of Eden where more than nine million species live in (almost) complete harmony. But it wasn’t always like this. Life on Earth has gone through five major extinctions, some of them way too close for comfort. Even earlier, in the first half of our planets 4.5-billion-year-old history, the seeds of life went through great strain before they could sprout. Experiments abounded as the first life-resembling cells saw the dim light of day on a planet that was still shrouded in a thick haze, with less than one-thousandth of one percent of today’s oxygen levels.

Ancient life did not require oxygen, however, the reactive gas absent from the atmosphere. Here and there, surprisingly constant in time, anaerobic life is still at home on planet Earth. You have a couple of anaerobic bacteria in your gut and the world’s first organisms, cells which resembled prokaryotes, used carbon dioxide as a carbon source and oxidized inorganic materials to extract energy.

Other creatures — like those whose fossils were recently discovered by University of Cincinnati researchers in two separate locations in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa — ‘ate’ sulfur.

“These are the oldest reported fossil sulfur bacteria to date,” says Andrew Czaja, UC assistant professor of geology. “And this discovery is helping us reveal a diversity of life and ecosystems that existed just prior to the Great Oxidation Event, a time of major atmospheric evolution.”

UC Professor Andrew Czaja indicates the layer of rock from which fossil bacteria were collected on a 2014 field excursion. Credit: Aaron Satkoski.

UC Professor Andrew Czaja indicates the layer of rock from which fossil bacteria were collected on a 2014 field excursion. Credit: Aaron Satkoski.

The 2.52 billion-year-old bacteria have been described as ‘exceptionally large’, or much larger than today’s bacteria. They used to be spherical-shaped, lined with smooth-walled microscopic structures — not too different from modern, but rare single-celled organisms that live in sulfur-rich waters at the bottom of the ocean.

“These fossils represent the oldest known organisms that lived in a very dark, deep-water environment,” says Czaja. “These bacteria existed two billion years before plants and trees, which evolved about 450 million years ago. We discovered these microfossils preserved in a layer of hard silica-rich rock called chert located within the Kaapvaal craton of South Africa.”

As you might imagine, finding rocks — let alone fossils — from the Neoarchean Eon is exceptionally rare. Moreover, these seem to surface only in a handful of areas around the world, such as this region of South Africa and another in Western Australia. There’s a connection between the two areas, although they’re now separated by thousands of miles of ocean. Billions of years ago, South African and Australia were part of the same supercontinent called Vaalbara before tectonic motion separated the great landmasses.

Radiocarbon dating suggests the new bacterial fossils lived in Vaalbara. The organisms, along with other shallow-water ancient bacteria, would eventually turn the atmosphere into an oxygen-rich air, releasing the molecule as a byproduct of photosynthesis. Perhaps not long after these particular specimens became fossilized, the Great Oxidation Event took place.

Czaja says these Neoarchean bacteria lived in the wet mud and in great numbers. For breakfast, lunch, and dinner, the bacteria likely ingested volcanic hydrogen sulfide (the odor of rotten eggs) and produced sulfate, an odorless gas, as a byproduct. This is the same process which modern bacteria employ when they decompose organic matter into minerals and gasses, proving recycling is as old as life itself.

“The waste product from one [bacteria] was food for the other,” adds Czaja.

“While I can’t claim that these early bacteria are the same ones we have today, we surmise that they may have been doing the same thing as some of our current bacteria,” says Czaja. “These early bacteria likely consumed the molecules dissolved from sulfur-rich minerals that came from land rocks that had eroded and washed out to sea, or from the volcanic remains on the ocean’s floor.

 

share Share

This 5,500-year-old Kish tablet is the oldest written document

Beer, goats, and grains: here's what the oldest document reveals.

A Huge, Lazy Black Hole Is Redefining the Early Universe

Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope have discovered a massive, dormant black hole from just 800 million years after the Big Bang.

Did Columbus Bring Syphilis to Europe? Ancient DNA Suggests So

A new study pinpoints the origin of the STD to South America.

The Magnetic North Pole Has Shifted Again. Here’s Why It Matters

The magnetic North pole is now closer to Siberia than it is to Canada, and scientists aren't sure why.

For better or worse, machine learning is shaping biology research

Machine learning tools can increase the pace of biology research and open the door to new research questions, but the benefits don’t come without risks.

This Babylonian Student's 4,000-Year-Old Math Blunder Is Still Relatable Today

More than memorializing a math mistake, stone tablets show just how advanced the Babylonians were in their time.

Sixty Years Ago, We Nearly Wiped Out Bed Bugs. Then, They Started Changing

Driven to the brink of extinction, bed bugs adapted—and now pesticides are almost useless against them.

LG’s $60,000 Transparent TV Is So Luxe It’s Practically Invisible

This TV screen vanishes at the push of a button.

Couple Finds Giant Teeth in Backyard Belonging to 13,000-year-old Mastodon

A New York couple stumble upon an ancient mastodon fossil beneath their lawn.

Worms and Dogs Thrive in Chernobyl’s Radioactive Zone — and Scientists are Intrigued

In the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, worms show no genetic damage despite living in highly radioactive soil, and free-ranging dogs persist despite contamination.