homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Coal particle pollution is twice as deadly as that from other sources

Pollution from coal-fired power plants is much more deadly than previously thought. But there is also some very good news.

Tibi Puiu
November 24, 2023 @ 8:42 pm

share Share

coal power plant
Credit: Pixabay.

Studies have routinely shown that exposure to fine particulate pollutants — known as PM2.5 because these particles are 2.5 microns or less in diameter — significantly increases the risk of all-cause mortality. However, not all of these particles are equal. A new study from researchers at George Mason University, the University of Texas, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health uncovered a grim fact: fine particulate pollutants (PM2.5) from coal-fired power plants pose more than double the mortality risk of PM2.5 from other sources.

Coal: much deadlier than we thought

Delving into U.S. Medicare and emissions data spanning from 1999 to 2020, the researchers found a staggering 460,000 deaths attributable to coal PM2.5. Most of these occurred between 1999 and 2007, coinciding with peak coal PM2.5 levels. This contradicts prior assumptions that coal PM2.5’s toxicity mirrored that of other PM2.5 sources.

Lucas Henneman, the study’s lead author, points out the significant underestimation of coal PM2.5’s mortality impact. He suggests that this insight could steer policymakers toward more effective air quality improvements, like stricter emissions controls or a shift to renewable energy sources.

“PM2.5 from coal has been treated as if it’s just another air pollutant. But it’s much more harmful than we thought, and its mortality burden has been seriously underestimated,” said lead author Lucas Henneman, assistant professor at George Mason.

coal pollution pm2.5
Coal PM2.5 used to be very bad, especially in the eastern part of the country. Compared to more than two decades ago, the air in the US is much cleaner. Credit: Science.

The team analyzed emissions from 480 coal power plants across the U.S. They tracked how wind spread sulfur dioxide and tracked its conversion into PM2.5, creating detailed exposure maps for each plant. By correlating these maps with extensive Medicare records, representing over 650 million person-years (years of life for every person), the researchers assessed the health impacts of exposure to coal PM2.5.

Their findings were striking: a 1.12% increase in mortality risk for every microgram per cubic meter increase in annual average coal PM2.5. Notably, coal-related pollution accounted for 25% of all PM2.5-related deaths among Medicare enrollees before 2009.

Deaths from coal plants decreased by 95% since 1999

The researchers also ranked coal-fired power plants by their impact on mortality, identifying 10 plants linked to at least 5,000 deaths each. This data, visualized in a public online tool, adds a layer of transparency to the study.

But the good news is that the average level of coal PM2.5 in the U.S. fell from 2.34 μg/m3 in 1999 to just 0.07 μg/m3 by 2020. Interestingly, the study noted a sharp decline in coal-related deaths after 2007, averaging 43,000 annually before dropping to only 1,600 by 2020. That’s a staggering improvement, equivalent to a 95% drop in premature deaths.

nnual number of excess deaths attributable to coal PM
Annual number of excess deaths attributable to coal PM2.5. Credit: Science.

Corwin Zigler, the study’s senior author, views this as a “success story” of U.S. policies reducing coal pollution’s burden. Yet, he stresses the ongoing need for cleaner energy solutions.

“Coal power plants were this major burden that U.S. policies have already significantly reduced. But we haven’t completely eliminated the burden — so this study provides us a better understanding of how health will continue to improve and lives will be saved if we move further toward a clean energy future,” Zigler said in a press release.

As coal remains a significant energy source in the U.S. and globally, the study’s findings are crucial for informing future energy and environmental policies. The scientists undescore the importance of balancing energy needs with environmental and health considerations.

The findings appeared in the journal Science.

share Share

Tennis May Add Nearly 10 Years to Your Life and Most People Are Ignoring It

Could a weekly match on the court be the secret to a longer, healthier life?

Humans Have Been Reshaping Earth with Fire for at Least 50,000 Years

Fossil charcoal reveals early humans’ growing impact on the carbon cycle before the Ice Age.

The Strangest Microbe Ever Found Straddles The Line Between Life and Non-Life

A newly discovered archaeon blurs the boundary between cells and viruses.

This $8750 Watch Was Designed for Space and Could Finally Replace Apollo-era Omega Watches

An audacious new timepiece dares to outshine Omega’s legacy in space

The Brain May Make New Neurons in Adulthood and Even Old Age

Researchers identify the birthplace of new brain cells well into late adulthood.

Your gut has a secret weapon against 'forever chemicals': microbes

Our bodies have some surprising allies sometimes.

High IQ People Are Strikingly Better at Forecasting the Future

New study shows intelligence shapes our ability to forecast life events accurately.

Newborns Feel Pain Long Before They Can Understand It

Tiny brains register pain early, but lack the networks to interpret or respond to it

Cheese Before Bed Might Actually Be Giving You Nightmares

Eating dairy or sweets late at night may fuel disturbing dreams, new study finds.

Scientists Ranked the Most Hydrating Drinks and Water Didn't Win

Milk is more hydrating than water. Here's why.