homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Are Americans fed up with DNA testing?

Ancestry and 23andMe, the largest DNA testing companies, have laid off staff this year after bad sales in the previous year.

Tibi Puiu
March 5, 2020 @ 4:14 pm

share Share

DNA testing took the US by storm, but the novelty seems to be wearing off.

A home DNA testing kit, with a saliva (spit or cheek swab) tube collector and return shipping box. This specific model is for Embark, a dog DNA testing company. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Increasingly affordable genetic sequencing technology and the appealing idea of unraveling one’s heritage has drawn millions of Americans to purchase home DNA kits. This has meant very good business for companies like Ancestry or 23andMe.

However, there are signs that the market has become saturated and that the best days of DNA testing are long behind it.

DNA testing looks out of fashion

Last month, Ancestry CEO Margo Georgiadis wrote a blog post citing “a slowdown in consumer demand across the entire DNA category” and announcing that 6% of its workforce was being laid off.

This isn’t a problem just for Ancestry — the entire market is being affected by shifts in consumer behavior. For instance, 23andMe slashed about 100 positions, or 14%, of its workforce. 

More than 30 million people around the world have taken a DNA test, more than half of which have been sold by Ancestry. About 10 million DNA kits were sold by 23andMe, most of which were in the United States.

If 2018 was a fantastic year for DNA testing, the same can’t be said about 2019. According to Second Measure, a company that infers market trends from consumer credit and debit card data, Ancestry’s sales were down 38% in November — what’s typically an excellent month for sales in anticipation of the holidays — compared to the same period in 2018. Meanwhile, 23andMe’s sales were down 54% compared to a year earlier. December, the best month of the year, saw a 15% decline for Ancestry and 48% for 23andMe.

So, what might be causing this sharp decline?

One obvious explanation is that DNA testing is marketed to a niche audience that is interested in learning more about their heritage and have enough disposable income to afford to pay at least $100 for this kind of service.

After 30 million people bought DNA kits, most of the market seems to have saturated. It’s also worth noting that the ancestry results are a lot like newspapers — they’re read by all the members of the family. Why would siblings or close relatives take a heritage test when they could just read yours?

“The DNA market is at an inflection point now that most early adopters have entered the category,” Georgiadis said.

Another major blow to the DNA testing market is privacy concerns. One particularly high-profile case, involving the Golden State Killer, helped highlight how this can be a huge problem for consumer’s most precious data — their genes. To track down the criminal, police used DNA from the killer’s third and fourth cousins who had bought DNA kits and had their information uploaded to a third-party site.

While the case can be seen as a success story in which DNA ancestry technology and law enforcement came together to solve an important case, the reality is that it exposed just how loosely genetic data is being traded and sold among third parties. This includes Silicon Valley startups and pharmaceutical juggernauts. Suddenly, DNA testing wasn’t just entertainment in people’s minds — consumers quickly realized that their genetic information is precious and shouldn’t be shared lightly with anyone.

Privacy concerns have been so vocal among some groups that the Pentagon issued a statement in December 2019, recommending armed forces members not to take DNA tests as they might risk “exposing sensitive genetic information to outside parties.”

Both Ancestry and 23andMe have stepped up their game since these stories have gone public. Their privacy guidelines and terms now require “express consent” from consumers before sharing their data with third parties.

And although not that many consumers are aware of this, DNA ancestry tests can be rather flawed and inaccurate. However, with a review such as this one, it does not mean that various types of DNA ancestry testing aren’t based on legitimate science. Hopefully, as sequencing tech improves, so will the error correction.

Looking to the future, it’s anyone’s guess if the DNA testing market will recover. It now seems unlikely that the industry will see the same tremendous growth it experienced in 2017 and 2018. However, don’t count DNA testing as dead yet. There are still billions of people around the world who haven’t tried the technology — and with a bit of convincing, they might want to buy.

share Share

A Dutch 17-Year-Old Forgot His Native Language After Knee Surgery and Spoke Only English Even Though He Had Never Used It Outside School

He experienced foreign language syndrome for about 24 hours, and remembered every single detail of the incident even after recovery.

Your Brain Hits a Metabolic Cliff at 43. Here’s What That Means

This is when brain aging quietly kicks in.

Scientists Just Found a Hidden Battery Life Killer and the Fix Is Shockingly Simple

A simple tweak could dramatically improve the lifespan of Li-ion batteries.

Westerners cheat AI agents while Japanese treat them with respect

Japan’s robots are redefining work, care, and education — with lessons for the world.

Scientists Turn to Smelly Frogs to Fight Superbugs: How Their Slime Might Be the Key to Our Next Antibiotics

Researchers engineer synthetic antibiotics from frog slime that kill deadly bacteria without harming humans.

This Popular Zero-Calorie Sugar Substitute May Be Making You Hungrier, Not Slimmer

Zero-calorie sweeteners might confuse the brain, especially in people with obesity

Any Kind of Exercise, At Any Age, Boosts Your Brain

Even light physical activity can sharpen memory and boost mood across all ages.

A Brain Implant Just Turned a Woman’s Thoughts Into Speech in Near Real Time

This tech restores speech in real time for people who can’t talk, using only brain signals.

Using screens in bed increases insomnia risk by 59% — but social media isn’t the worst offender

Forget blue light, the real reason screens disrupt sleep may be simpler than experts thought.

Beetles Conquered Earth by Evolving a Tiny Chemical Factory

There are around 66,000 species of rove beetles and one researcher proposes it's because of one special gland.