homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Humans are exterminating mammals faster than evolution can keep up

Saving biodiversity makes more sense than waiting millions of years for it to re-evolve.

Tibi Puiu
October 16, 2018 @ 3:18 pm

share Share

How small mammals need to evolve in order to diversity and make up for the loss of large mammals. Credit: Matt Davis, Aarhus University.

How small mammals need to evolve in order to diversify and make up for the loss of large mammals. Credit: Matt Davis, Aarhus University.

In the past half-billion years, there have been five major mass extinction events that annihilated most of life on Earth. The Permian-Triassic extinction, for instance, took place about 250 million years ago at the end of the Permian period and wiped out 96% of all marine species and over three-quarters of land vertebrates. The latest mass extinction, the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction, killed off the dinosaurs about 65 million years ago. Scientists now argue that we’re the brink of a sixth mass extinction — but while previous events were triggered by calamities, such as massive volcanic eruptions or an asteroid impact, this time the vector is a single species: Homo sapiens. 

Given the current rate at which humans are exterminating animal and plant species, researchers at the Aarhus University and the University of Gothenburg calculated how long would it take for biodiversity to recover. Even in an optimistic scenario, where conservation efforts manage to halt habitat destruction and reduce extinction rates back to background levels seen in fossils, it will take mammals 3-5 million years to regenerate the evolutionary branches that they will lose in the next 50 years. It will take more than 5 million years to regenerate the biodiversity that was lost from giant Ice Age species.

Save biodiversity before it’s too late

The team of researchers used an extensive database of mammals that includes not only existing species but also those that went extinct since Homo sapiens expanded across the globe.

Every species that went extinct because of us represents a tragedy. But the ecological value of some of these species is greater than others. There are hundreds of species of shrew, so if it loses a few, the lineage still has enough members to breed biodiversity. That’s not the case for some megafauna species such as giant sloths and sabre-toothed tigers, which used to be highly evolutionary distinct and went extinct 10,000 years ago, with humans playing a major role. When these distinct lineages disappeared, entire branches of the evolutionary tree of life collapsed.

In order to establish the time required for mammalian species to recover to biodiversity levels seen before humans entered the big picture, the researchers performed advanced evolutionary simulations on powerful computers.

They inspected several scenarios, modeling the complex evolutionary relationships between existing and extinct mammals, finding that even under the most optimistic scenario, it would still take up to five million years for the mammalian life to regenerate its lost branches and twigs of the evolutionary tree.

According to the study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, iconic species such as the black rhino could become extinct within the next 50 years, while Asian elephants have only a 33% chance of surviving past this century.

“Although we once lived in a world of giants: giant beavers, giant armadillos, giant deer, etc., we now live in a world that is becoming increasingly impoverished of large wild mammalian species. The few remaining giants, such as rhinos and elephants, are in danger of being wiped out very rapidly,” says Professor Jens-Christian Svenning from Aarhus University, who heads a large research program on megafauna, which includes the study.

The findings make a case for strengthening conservation efforts now because simple math dictates that it’s much easier to save biodiversity than to wait for it to evolve later.

share Share

A Dutch 17-Year-Old Forgot His Native Language After Knee Surgery and Spoke Only English Even Though He Had Never Used It Outside School

He experienced foreign language syndrome for about 24 hours, and remembered every single detail of the incident even after recovery.

Your Brain Hits a Metabolic Cliff at 43. Here’s What That Means

This is when brain aging quietly kicks in.

Scientists Just Found a Hidden Battery Life Killer and the Fix Is Shockingly Simple

A simple tweak could dramatically improve the lifespan of Li-ion batteries.

Westerners cheat AI agents while Japanese treat them with respect

Japan’s robots are redefining work, care, and education — with lessons for the world.

Scientists Turn to Smelly Frogs to Fight Superbugs: How Their Slime Might Be the Key to Our Next Antibiotics

Researchers engineer synthetic antibiotics from frog slime that kill deadly bacteria without harming humans.

This Popular Zero-Calorie Sugar Substitute May Be Making You Hungrier, Not Slimmer

Zero-calorie sweeteners might confuse the brain, especially in people with obesity

Any Kind of Exercise, At Any Age, Boosts Your Brain

Even light physical activity can sharpen memory and boost mood across all ages.

A Brain Implant Just Turned a Woman’s Thoughts Into Speech in Near Real Time

This tech restores speech in real time for people who can’t talk, using only brain signals.

Using screens in bed increases insomnia risk by 59% — but social media isn’t the worst offender

Forget blue light, the real reason screens disrupt sleep may be simpler than experts thought.

We Should Start Worrying About Space Piracy. Here's Why This Could be A Big Deal

“We are arguing that it’s already started," say experts.