homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Native Americans didn't make massive changes to the environment. It was the Europeans

They apparently lived in harmony with the environment -- even in urban areas.

Mihai Andrei
January 20, 2020 @ 7:31 pm

share Share

An idea that has been gaining a lot of popularity recently is that the North American landscape was altered by settlers way before colonists arrived there.

A new study reports that contrary to this belief, early populations made minor changes to the landscape. The European colonists were the main drivers of environmental change.

The question seems fairly straightforward. Over the past 14,000 years (since the first settlers arrived on the continent) were humans the major drivers of environmental change in New England or were they merely responding to changes in the climate?

Answering the question, however, is anything but straightforward. In order to address it, a team of researchers analyzed data from multiple sources, from pollen records and archaeology to fire history gathered from charcoal in lake cores. They combed through data over the past 14,000 years, mapping everything together and performing an analysis. It was a pretty conclusive history of pre-colonial Native American history.

The results, researchers say, show that these populations weren’t drastically altering their environment. They were more prone to reacting to environmental changes rather than causing the changes themselves.

Even evidence of fire used to alter landscapes was very limited.

“The paleo-climate, paleo-ecology and archaeological records suggest that native peoples were not modifying their immediate environments to a great degree,” said Chilton. “And they certainly were not doing so with large-scale fire or clear-cutting of trees. The widespread and intensive deforestation and agriculture brought by Europeans in the 17th century was in clear contrast to what had come before. Previous conservation practices had been based on a presumption that Native Americans manipulated their environments using fire, and this research does not support that interpretation.”

There are several consequences to this study. Firstly, it offers important lessons for contemporary sustainability and eco-friendly practices. Although our technology and way of life are vastly different from those of our ancestors, there may still be ideas that we can learn and apply.

It also helps set the record straight. It was surprising even to researchers to see how little of an impact North Americans had during pre-colonial times. Even in urban areas, they mostly lived in harmony with the environment.

“Much to my surprise, we found that, even though we know that Native Americans were in New England for at least 14,000 years with, at certain times in history, fairly large population densities, the ecological signal was essentially invisible,” said Chilton. “If one did not know there had been humans on the landscape, it would be almost impossible to detect them on a regional scale. After the arrival of Europeans, large-scale cutting and burning of forests is very clear in the ecological record.”

“Ancient native people thrived under changing forest conditions not by intensively managing them but by adapting to them and the changing environment,” added Chilton.

The paper, “Conservation implications of limited Native American impacts in pre-contact New England,” was published in Nature Sustainability.

share Share

This 5,500-year-old Kish tablet is the oldest written document

Beer, goats, and grains: here's what the oldest document reveals.

A Huge, Lazy Black Hole Is Redefining the Early Universe

Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope have discovered a massive, dormant black hole from just 800 million years after the Big Bang.

Did Columbus Bring Syphilis to Europe? Ancient DNA Suggests So

A new study pinpoints the origin of the STD to South America.

The Magnetic North Pole Has Shifted Again. Here’s Why It Matters

The magnetic North pole is now closer to Siberia than it is to Canada, and scientists aren't sure why.

For better or worse, machine learning is shaping biology research

Machine learning tools can increase the pace of biology research and open the door to new research questions, but the benefits don’t come without risks.

This Babylonian Student's 4,000-Year-Old Math Blunder Is Still Relatable Today

More than memorializing a math mistake, stone tablets show just how advanced the Babylonians were in their time.

Sixty Years Ago, We Nearly Wiped Out Bed Bugs. Then, They Started Changing

Driven to the brink of extinction, bed bugs adapted—and now pesticides are almost useless against them.

LG’s $60,000 Transparent TV Is So Luxe It’s Practically Invisible

This TV screen vanishes at the push of a button.

Couple Finds Giant Teeth in Backyard Belonging to 13,000-year-old Mastodon

A New York couple stumble upon an ancient mastodon fossil beneath their lawn.

Worms and Dogs Thrive in Chernobyl’s Radioactive Zone — and Scientists are Intrigued

In the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, worms show no genetic damage despite living in highly radioactive soil, and free-ranging dogs persist despite contamination.