homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Wrongfully accused: replacing butter with vegetable oils doesn't cut health risk

No matter who you ask, they’ll tell you the same thing: butter isn’t good for you, just use vegetable oil. But while butter may not be the healthiest of foods, new research has found that replacing it with vegetable oils does not decrease risk of heart disease. The main culprit is linoleic acid – a polyunsaturated […]

Mihai Andrei
April 15, 2016 @ 2:42 pm

share Share

No matter who you ask, they’ll tell you the same thing: butter isn’t good for you, just use vegetable oil. But while butter may not be the healthiest of foods, new research has found that replacing it with vegetable oils does not decrease risk of heart disease.

Photo by Steve Karg.

The main culprit is linoleic acid – a polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acid. The research, which was studied in the British Medical Journal, suggests that using vegetable oils high in linoleic acid might be worse than using butter when it comes to preventing heart disease. Basically, their study found not that butter is better for you, but that vegetable oils are worse for you: their benefits were overestimated and their risks were underestimated.

“Altogether, this research leads us to conclude that incomplete publication of important data has contributed to the overestimation of benefits — and the underestimation of potential risks — of replacing saturated fat with vegetable oils rich in linoleic acid,” said co-first author Daisy Zamora, PhD, a researcher in the Department of Psychiatry at the UNC School of Medicine.

The findings were confirmed for corn oil, as well as safflower oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, and cottonseed oil. As far as I could find, olive oil seems to not be so bad for your health.

The idea that butter is bad for you and should be replaced with vegetable oils emerged in the 1960s, when studies began to show that this dietary switch lowered blood cholesterol levels. Since then, several studies have shown that vegetable oils are better for you than butter, but several randomized controlled trials were unable to demonstrate that linoleic acid-based dietary interventions reduce the risk of heart attacks or deaths.

The biggest trove of data available comes from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment (MCE), which was conducted by Minnesota researchers between 1968 and 1973. It enrolled 9,423 patients in six state mental hospitals and one state-run nursing home. Its results did not appear in a medical journal until 1989. The investigators reported then that a switch to corn oil from butter and other saturated fats did lower cholesterol levels but made no difference in terms of heart attacks, deaths due to heart attacks, or overall deaths. But not all the data from that study was published, and some doubts were cast on the initial conclusions.

“Looking closely, we realized that some of the important analyses that the MCE investigators had planned to do were missing from the paper,” Zamora said.

They recovered much of the data of the original study and added new data to their existing datasets from the Sydney study and the other three published randomized clinical trials of linoleic acid-based dietary interventions. All of the information put together seemed to point into one direction: switching the butter out of your diet and replacing it with vegetable oils doesn’t make much of a difference when it comes to heart diseases.

share Share

This 5,500-year-old Kish tablet is the oldest written document

Beer, goats, and grains: here's what the oldest document reveals.

A Huge, Lazy Black Hole Is Redefining the Early Universe

Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope have discovered a massive, dormant black hole from just 800 million years after the Big Bang.

Did Columbus Bring Syphilis to Europe? Ancient DNA Suggests So

A new study pinpoints the origin of the STD to South America.

The Magnetic North Pole Has Shifted Again. Here’s Why It Matters

The magnetic North pole is now closer to Siberia than it is to Canada, and scientists aren't sure why.

For better or worse, machine learning is shaping biology research

Machine learning tools can increase the pace of biology research and open the door to new research questions, but the benefits don’t come without risks.

This Babylonian Student's 4,000-Year-Old Math Blunder Is Still Relatable Today

More than memorializing a math mistake, stone tablets show just how advanced the Babylonians were in their time.

Sixty Years Ago, We Nearly Wiped Out Bed Bugs. Then, They Started Changing

Driven to the brink of extinction, bed bugs adapted—and now pesticides are almost useless against them.

LG’s $60,000 Transparent TV Is So Luxe It’s Practically Invisible

This TV screen vanishes at the push of a button.

Couple Finds Giant Teeth in Backyard Belonging to 13,000-year-old Mastodon

A New York couple stumble upon an ancient mastodon fossil beneath their lawn.

Worms and Dogs Thrive in Chernobyl’s Radioactive Zone — and Scientists are Intrigued

In the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, worms show no genetic damage despite living in highly radioactive soil, and free-ranging dogs persist despite contamination.