homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Cloning a mammoth ? Not so fast!

In a recent post I was telling you about Russian and Japanese researchers working together with the purpose of cloning a mammoth from bone marrow DNA recently found in Siberia. However, many researchers are extremely skeptical about this, including some of the world’s leading experts. “C’mon, it’ll never happen. Not in my lifetime,” said Webb […]

Mihai Andrei
December 7, 2011 @ 1:55 pm

share Share

In a recent post I was telling you about Russian and Japanese researchers working together with the purpose of cloning a mammoth from bone marrow DNA recently found in Siberia. However, many researchers are extremely skeptical about this, including some of the world’s leading experts.

“C’mon, it’ll never happen. Not in my lifetime,” said Webb Miller, a Penn State computer scientist and genomicist who helped decipher the genetic code of a woolly mammoth.

Japanese and Russian scientists have been trying for a long time to find the key to cloning mammoths, and they recently declared they found a suitable candidate in the Siberian permafrost. Their plan is to take the nuclei of bone marrow cells, transplant them into egg cells extracted from elephants and then implant the cloned embryos into a surrogate elephant mother. Their news report claims “there is a high likelihood” that biologically active nuclei can be extracted from the frozen marrow. But Miller doesn’t believe that.

“DNA from a woolly mammoth is a mess,” he explained. “It’s fractured into very short pieces, and there’s a lot of postmortem DNA damage other than just breakage. The code gets damaged a lot.”

Even if they manage to go through with the procedure, the odds for cloned animals aren’t really that good – especially with extinct or near extinction species. There is no official number, but there are way, way more failures than successes. However, Miller says there is much value in studying and understanding extinct DNA, even without a ‘resurrection’.

“I’m looking out my window, and 13,000 years ago, there were some really interesting animals out there,” he mused. “They’re gone now, and I’d like to know why. … Understanding which species survived and which ones didn’t, looking at their genome and trying to figure that out, that’s interesting to me.”

share Share

Underwater Tool Use: These Rainbow-Colored Fish Smash Shells With Rocks

Wrasse fish crack open shells with rocks in behavior once thought exclusive to mammals and birds.

This Freshwater Fish Can Live Over 120 Years and Shows No Signs of Aging. But It Has a Problem

An ancient freshwater species may be quietly facing a silent collapse.

Sharks Aren’t Silent After All. This One Clicks Like a Castanet

This is the first evidence of sound production in a shark.

23andMe Just Filed for Bankruptcy and Your DNA Could Be Up for Grabs

A company once worth billions now faces a reckoning over the fate of your genetic data

This Medieval Bear in Romania Was A Victim of Human Lead Pollution

One bear. Six years. One hidden history of pollution brought to light by a laser.

World’s Oldest Person Had Cells 17 Years Younger Than Her Age. The Surprising Diet and Habits That Helped Her Live to 117

The supercentenarian’s gut health may hold the key to longevity.

Some 31 million years ago, these iguanas rafted over 5,000 miles of ocean

New research reveals an extraordinary journey across the Pacific that defies what we thought was possible.

Finally, mRNA vaccines against cancer are starting to become a reality

mRNA vaccines were first developed years ago to target cancers and now they're really starting to show promise.

When Did Humans First Speak? New Genetic Clues Point to 135,000 Years Ago

Language is one of the biggest force multipliers in our species. It appeared earlier than expected.

Magnolias are so ancient they're pollinated by beetles — because bees didn't exist yet

Before bees, there were beetles