homehome Home chatchat Notifications


Gene mutation helped early humans cope with smoke infested caves, but not Neanderthals

Early humans were far better smokers than Neanderthals, and this might have mattered a lot in the end.

Tibi Puiu
August 4, 2016 @ 4:18 pm

share Share

smoke-humans

Credit: Pixabay

Pennsylvania State University researchers claim they’ve uncovered a gene that helps humans cope with the toxicity of smoke. This gene wasn’t found in specimens belonging to Neanderthals or Denisovans, two other hominin species which were contemporary with homo sapiens for thousands of years before becoming extinct.

A smokey edge

The researchers posit that this mutation must have given humans an evolutionary edge against the two other species. Some 50,000 years ago, humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans lived mostly in caves where fires must have clouded everything in smoke.

When we eat grilled meat or inhale smoke, toxic byproducts like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are absorbed by the body which cause DNA mutations, cancer or sudden death. Luckily, when PAHs enter the body enzymes are produced to break down the chemicals and flush them out. If there’s too much smoke, however, the body goes into enzyme production overdrive, which triggers the formation of a number of even more toxic byproducts — but not if you have a gene mutation in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, found in the in the middle of the ligand-binding domain.

All modern humans have this mutation, but when the researchers led by Gary Perdew, the John T. and Paige S. Smith Professor in Agricultural Sciences, Penn State, sequenced the DNA of three Neanderthals and one Denisovian they couldn’t find any. Not having this mutation could have made all the difference — from a hundred to a thousand-fold more aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand sensitivity.

“For Neandertals, inhaling smoke and eating charcoal-broiled meat, they would be exposed to multiple sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are known to be carcinogens and lead to cell death at high concentrations,” said Perdew in a statement. “The evolutionary hypothesis is, if Neandertals were exposed to large amounts of these smoke-derived toxins, it could lead to respiratory problems, decreased reproductive capacity for women and increased susceptibility to respiratory viruses among preadolescents, while humans would exhibit decreased toxicity because they are more slowly metabolizing these compounds.”

The same tolerance also helped humans pick up some bad habits, like smoking tobacco, the researchers wrote in their paper published in Molecular Biology and Evolution

All hominids included in this study knew how to make fire. In fact, a previous study found Neanderthals were clever enough to use manganese dioxide — a substance commonly used in batteries today — to light their camps. The first hominid to use fire was likely Homo erectus, a species which regularly made use of the blaze to cook, fend off predators, provide warmth and possibly ritualistic purposes 1.9 million years ago. Any species which followed H. erectus must have learned to light and maintain fires as well.

“Cooking with fire could have allowed our ancestors to incorporate a broader range of foods in our diets, for example, by softening roots and tubers that might otherwise have been hard to chew,” Perry said. “Cooking could also help increase the digestibility of other foods, both in chewing time and reduced energetic investment in digestion.”

“Besides heating and cooking, humans used — and still use — fire for landscape burning and as part of hunting and gathering, and now as part of agriculture,” he added.

I would caution, however, readers that this is still a tentative hypothesis. After all, the researchers could only look at three Neanderthals and a Denisovan. A lot more DNA from more specimens should be sequenced before any definite conclusion can be made. Already, some critics aren’t convinced.

“Neanderthals were the ultimate cave-dwelling fire users. If there was some selective disadvantage against this, then they would have died out a long time before they did. But they were actually one of the more successful stories in human evolution and lasted a really long time compared to other hominids,” David Wright, an archaeologist at Seoul National University and the University of York, told The Guardian.

“That somehow Homo erectus and Neanderthals and dozens of other hominid species couldn’t handle sitting around a fire, it doesn’t make any sense to me,” he added. “The problem is it’s really difficult to test, because we can’t take a Neanderthal and sit them next to a fire to see how they react.”

share Share

A Dutch 17-Year-Old Forgot His Native Language After Knee Surgery and Spoke Only English Even Though He Had Never Used It Outside School

He experienced foreign language syndrome for about 24 hours, and remembered every single detail of the incident even after recovery.

Your Brain Hits a Metabolic Cliff at 43. Here’s What That Means

This is when brain aging quietly kicks in.

Scientists Just Found a Hidden Battery Life Killer and the Fix Is Shockingly Simple

A simple tweak could dramatically improve the lifespan of Li-ion batteries.

Westerners cheat AI agents while Japanese treat them with respect

Japan’s robots are redefining work, care, and education — with lessons for the world.

Scientists Turn to Smelly Frogs to Fight Superbugs: How Their Slime Might Be the Key to Our Next Antibiotics

Researchers engineer synthetic antibiotics from frog slime that kill deadly bacteria without harming humans.

This Popular Zero-Calorie Sugar Substitute May Be Making You Hungrier, Not Slimmer

Zero-calorie sweeteners might confuse the brain, especially in people with obesity

Any Kind of Exercise, At Any Age, Boosts Your Brain

Even light physical activity can sharpen memory and boost mood across all ages.

A Brain Implant Just Turned a Woman’s Thoughts Into Speech in Near Real Time

This tech restores speech in real time for people who can’t talk, using only brain signals.

Using screens in bed increases insomnia risk by 59% — but social media isn’t the worst offender

Forget blue light, the real reason screens disrupt sleep may be simpler than experts thought.

We Should Start Worrying About Space Piracy. Here's Why This Could be A Big Deal

“We are arguing that it’s already started," say experts.