homehome Home chatchat Notifications


FDA bans antibacterial soaps: “No scientific evidence” they’re safe or effective

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a final ruling effectively banning antibacterial soaps as they exist today.

Alexandra Gerea
September 5, 2016 @ 1:03 pm

share Share

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a final ruling effectively banning antibacterial soaps.

The ruling established that over-the-counter consumer antiseptic wash products containing certain active ingredients cannot be marketed. This final rule applies to consumer antiseptic wash products containing one or more of 19 specific active ingredients, including the two most common ingredients: triclosan and triclocarban. This doesn’t affect consumer hand “sanitizers” or wipes, or antibacterial products used in health care settings.

Why this matters

Antibacterial soap doesn’t work – or in other words, there’s no solid evidence that it works. If you wash your hands with regular soap or antibacterial soap, it’s the same thing.

“Consumers may think antibacterial washes are more effective at preventing the spread of germs, but we have no scientific evidence that they are any better than plain soap and water,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). “In fact, some data suggests that antibacterial ingredients may do more harm than good over the long-term.”

This initiative first kicked off in 2013, and since then, antibacterial hand and body wash manufacturers “did not provide the necessary data to establish safety and effectiveness” for the banned ingredients.

More harm than good

What we, as consumers should do in light of the recent announcement, is wash our hands with regular soap and water – not just because it’s just as effective as antibacterial soap, but because in the long run, it’s actually healthier.

No, you shouldn’t.

The antimicrobial triclosan was introduced to hospitals back in the 1960s, but by the mid-1980s, marketers took advantage of the situation and sold it to the general public over the counter, promising to protect people by killing all the bacteria. But the thing is, most common conditions (common colds, sores, flus) are caused by viruses, not bacteria, and antibacterial soap doesn’t do much to kill viruses.

“The evidence is strong that these products don’t reduce infectious illnesses,” says Allison Aiello, a professor of epidemiology at the Gillings School of Public Health in Chapel Hill who has studied triclosan for years. Bacterial concerns like salmonella and E. coli are commonly found on food, and hand-washing won’t make any difference there.

Furthermore, while in hospital soaps, the concentration of antibacterial is very high, in consumer products, that concentration is much low. Instead of killing all the bacteria, it creates a sort of training ground, where most of the bateria would be killed, but the surviving ones would be much stronger. Thus, a new generation of superbugs was bred.

What we should do

This decision shouldn’t affect people that much, at least not directly. Continue washing your hands, just use regular soap and water, it works just fine. The same thing goes for wet wipes and alcohol-based sanitizers – try avoiding ones with antibacterial substances. In the long run, we should expect a decline in the emergence of superbugs.

 

 

share Share

This 5,500-year-old Kish tablet is the oldest written document

Beer, goats, and grains: here's what the oldest document reveals.

A Huge, Lazy Black Hole Is Redefining the Early Universe

Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope have discovered a massive, dormant black hole from just 800 million years after the Big Bang.

Did Columbus Bring Syphilis to Europe? Ancient DNA Suggests So

A new study pinpoints the origin of the STD to South America.

The Magnetic North Pole Has Shifted Again. Here’s Why It Matters

The magnetic North pole is now closer to Siberia than it is to Canada, and scientists aren't sure why.

For better or worse, machine learning is shaping biology research

Machine learning tools can increase the pace of biology research and open the door to new research questions, but the benefits don’t come without risks.

This Babylonian Student's 4,000-Year-Old Math Blunder Is Still Relatable Today

More than memorializing a math mistake, stone tablets show just how advanced the Babylonians were in their time.

Sixty Years Ago, We Nearly Wiped Out Bed Bugs. Then, They Started Changing

Driven to the brink of extinction, bed bugs adapted—and now pesticides are almost useless against them.

LG’s $60,000 Transparent TV Is So Luxe It’s Practically Invisible

This TV screen vanishes at the push of a button.

Couple Finds Giant Teeth in Backyard Belonging to 13,000-year-old Mastodon

A New York couple stumble upon an ancient mastodon fossil beneath their lawn.

Worms and Dogs Thrive in Chernobyl’s Radioactive Zone — and Scientists are Intrigued

In the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, worms show no genetic damage despite living in highly radioactive soil, and free-ranging dogs persist despite contamination.